November 19, 2008

Beshear gets it right on MTR regulation

It might be the first time I’ve said this since the 2007 election, but Steve Beshear is right. On Monday, Beshear - along with more traditional environmental advocates Ben Chandler, John Yarmuth and Jack Conway - wrote a letter to the EPA condemning the proposed changes to the Stream Buffer Zone rule, which currently requires coal companies to avoid mining within 100 feet of a waterway. The rewritten rule would eliminate the buffer zone, potentially allowing hundreds (even thousands) of miles of waterways to be buried in Appalachia under the overburden from MTR mines. The changes have been in the works for years, and now coal companies are trying to get them pushed through in the 11th hour before the Bush administration gets the boot on January 20th. While an Obama administration, despite its less-than-stellar record on coal, certainly won’t be buying the BS of the coal industry when in office.

Beshear wrote:

I am strongly committed to environmentally responsible coal mining and cannot support rules that may be subject to arbitrary administration or enforcement…This will not serve our state well, nor will it provide more regulatory certainty for the industry.

While I’m still not sure what “environmentally responsible coal mining” is, or where it is practiced, this statement is a drastic departure from this summer’s ‘mountaintop removal is awesome, let’s do it more often’ remarks of Dr. Dan.

Beshear’s adamant opposition to the proposal is a welcome surprise, especially looking in retrospect to his own comments, as well as the Lieutenant Governor’s, about mountaintop removal over the summer. So while this wasn’t necessarily an expected move, it is representative of the (sometimes small) differences between the thusfar lackluster Beshear administration and the atrocious four years of Ernie Fletcher that we endured. Had we so stupidly reelected Fletcher (like we did McConnell), there would certainly be no support from the state government to stop the loosening of the stream buffer zone laws. Small victories, folks. Small victories.

In other related, upcoming news, Governor Beshear should be releasing his energy plan on Thursday. word seems to have it that the thing isn’t all that bad, save some nonsense about nuclear power. look forward to it!

November 18, 2008

Wrapping up UK’s Inaugural Sustainability Lecture Series

Last night was a first for the University of Kentucky. Monday night was not just important for the words that were said, but also for the meaning which made those words possible. The Inaugural Sustainability Lecture Series at UK represented the first time that the university administration has ever directly invested in sustainability programming. For a university that has been battling itself for years over sustainability initiatives, Monday night was a big first step.

The lecture by Tom FitzGerald, who I called the consummate environmental activist, was many things. In a style that only Fitz could manage, he deviated completely from his planned remarks and spoke to any number of issues facing the Commonwealth’s environment. From debunking the myths of limited renewable energy capacity in the state, ‘clean coal’ (Fitz said it best by saying “clean coal isn’t” - pretty succinct, huh?) and the impracticality of simultaneously building a healthy economy and creating a cleaner environment. Perhaps more importantly than the education which Fitz provided to many of us, he provided inspiration. Recounting stories that stressed the importance of leadership and public service, it’s hard to listen to a man like Fitz and not leave the room filled with energy (no pun intended) and a sense that maybe you’ve been doing things wrong all this time. But there were two important things that Fitz left us with:

Be creatively intolerant of injustice and mediocrity and approach problem-solving with an open mind, since it is in dialogue, in engagement, that we arrive at solutions.

Being an environmentalist is often a losing battle, but regardless of the concessions that are often made in order to create progress, we must never accept mediocrity. With Fitz’s optimism about our generation’s role in solving our climate crisis, it’s hard for that not to rub off on you.

If you came out to the lecture on Monday night in all of the cold and snow, (as the organizer of the event) I appreciate it a great deal. Hopefully we’ll see you again in April!

Check out more press from the Kentucky Kernel in their wrap-up of the lecture

November 17, 2008

Event: Inaugural Sustainability Lecture Series @ UK

UK_poster_flatWHAT: The Inaugural Sustainability Lecture Series with Tom FitzGerald
WHEN: Monday, November 17th @ 7pm
WHERE: Worsham Theater in the University of Kentucky Student Center
HOW MUCH: FREE and open to the public

To most anyone who reads this blog regularly, you’ll have no misconceptions about the University of Kentucky’s record on sustainability initiatives. For the most part, the university has done little to ease its impact on the earth in any way, much less a way that promotes economic and social equity. So we’ve never been short of our fair share of problems.

But, in a small way, Monday represents a drastic change for the university. For the first time in its history, the University of Kentucky administration has put money forth for the express purpose of promoting sustainability. The Inaugural Sustainability Lecture Series at UK will feature Tom FitzGerald, environmental lawyer, executive director of the Kentucky Resources Council and recent recipient of the 14th Annual Heinz Award in the Environment. More importantly than his formal accolades, Fitz has been a tireless advocate for Kentucky’s land and people over the past thirty years, working to pass legislation to protect the environment and holding the worst of offenders accountable for their actions. If none of that serves as a glowing enough endorsement for you, know that when we initially approached Wendell Berry to deliver the lecture, Wendell said that if he could choose anybody else to deliver the lecture - mind you, this means anybody in the entire world - he chose Fitz. If that doesn’t help you understand the importance that Tom FitzGerald has in this state, I’m not sure what will.

The Sustainability Lecture Series was funded through a generous gift by UK President Lee Todd in order to recompense students who were short-changed by the last second cutting of last year’s student green fee by UK SG President Nick Phelps and staff trustee Russ Williams. Because of President Todd’s gracious move, we were able to make this event possible and we hope that all of you will join us in taking the first step to creating a culture of sustainability at our campus. Hopefully this will just be the first of many lectures to be delivered at UK about sustainability, as well as the first of many sustainability initiatives which will become staples one our campus. Hope to see you there!

UPDATED: check out press coverage from the Kentucky Kernel here

November 13, 2008

Lexington to introduce storm water tax

h/t to the Herald-Leader:

although there has been talk of this for over a year, the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government is now in the process of introducing an impervious surface tax on landowners in order to fund the $250-300 million improvements mandated by the EPA Consent Decree. Granted, the legislation is still in a working phase and must be approved by the Urban County Council to go into effect.

The tax is fairly minimal for the average homeowner (as it should be) at just $4.16/month - but for commercial property owners with gigantic asphalt parking lots with poor drainage systems (cough Fayette Mall cough Lexington Mall cough), the price will be much steeper. They will be taxed $4.16/month for every 2500 square feet of impervious surface. While this is the same rate as the smaller residential properties, consider the massive amount of impervious surface created by the roofs and parking lots of Lexington’s many mega-buildings to get a gauge on how much they’ll be paying.

What this will hopefully mean is an incentive for Lexington businesses to go ahead and take some steps towards integrating sustainability into their building practices - such as pervious concrete for parking lots. Or, in the case of the Lexington Mall, which has been almost entirely defunct for ten years, the absentee landowners will be forced to sell the property which can then be used for something worthwhile. But perhaps these are all just hopes and dreams.

The coolest bit of news out of the Herald-Leader’s article is that:

There will, however, be matching funds for neighborhood programs that include things such as rain barrels or rain gardens.

For as much as I am disgruntled with alot of what happens around here, it’s nice to see some people get it - even in small ways.

November 13, 2008

This isn’t about Obama, it’s about Kentucky!

UK_poster_flatMy weekly column in the Kentucky Kernel came out today, accompanied with the headline, “Obama will work for sustainability”. While I would believe that statement to be generally true, and I considered myself a significant supporter of President-elect Obama, I have absolutely no idea why that would be the headline on my column. Of the twenty-five sentences in my column, only the first four have anything to do with Barack Obama in any way whatsoever. Instead, the article is about the future of our state and our university in battling global warming, especially in the context of a new energy and environmental policy that will certainly become a reality early on in an Obama administration. The article is about the future of sustainability policy at UK in the wake of the university’s Inaugural Sustainability Lecture Series which will be held next Monday. But for whatever reason, the Kentucky Kernel has a terrible time in actually discerning content from nonsense, much less promoting worthwhile debate about important issues over stories about fraternities being unwelcoming to students. I’ll go as far as to say the headline to my column is the result of the cult of personality that, undoubtedly, has clouded the reality of massive changes that will be brought about in the new administration. Obama won’t save the world, but he certainly couldn’t do much to make it worse than it has been for the last eight years. Maybe nobody at the Kernel actually read my column? Or perhaps journalists just have trouble with reading comprehension. Not quite sure I understand people anymore.

Take the jump to read my full article from the Kernel… Keep reading →

November 12, 2008

UK debate featured lecture by climate change denier

On Monday, a consortium of geologists and climate scientists from Kentucky hosted a debate over climate change entitled “Climate Change – Manmade Catastrophe or Natural Cycle” at the University of Kentucky. One speaker was Dr. Kurt Cuffey, chair of the Dept. of Geography at UC - Berkeley and a renowned climate scientist, while the other speaker was Dr. Timothy Patterson, a renowned denier of the scientific consensus of anthropogenic global warming. Somehow I missed the memo on this and didn’t get to attend, but heard about the goings-on second hand from a professor at UK.

Granted that Tim Patterson holds a Ph.D. in geology, thus lending him some amount of credibility (but then again, people like Jerome Corsi hold doctorates from Harvard - so what does a Ph.D. really mean these days?), how in the hell can a respectable university (whether you call UK respectable might be another issue) invite someone who is so clearly on the wrong side of science to lecture on a topic of the utmost importance such as global warming? They honestly can’t be serious.

According to what I heard of the debate, Patterson failed to present any empirical evidence whatsoever for his position that global warming is not only not man-made, but non-existent; whereas, Cuffey presented a significant amount of his own research which proved just the opposite (don’t tell me that you’re surprised). I’m all about having meaningful discussion over controversial issues - but since when was there a debate to be had about whether or not global warming is real? Was Michael Oppenheimer not just on campus? I thought we were seriously getting somewhere. Sometimes it’s hard to understand how things shake out at this university - actually, I never quite understand how things shake out.

November 5, 2008

Say hello to a new president, new climate policy

Environmentalists everywhere, REJOICE! Not only are we just a short time away from a new president, but we’re also just a short time away from a complete 180 degree turn in the way our nation approaches energy and environmental policy. Help is on the way, folks.

UPDATED (11/07/08 9:16pm):

The Obama administration has already gotten started on making some things happen, including setting up the impressive website of the president-elect: http://change.gov. The transition team has already outlined the priorities for energy & environmental policy in the new administration, unsurprisingly similar to Obama’s plans from the campaign:

The Obama-Biden comprehensive New Energy for America plan will:

  • Provide short-term relief to American families facing pain at the pump
  • Help create five million new jobs by strategically investing $150 billion over the next ten years to catalyze private efforts to build a clean energy future.
  • Within 10 years save more oil than we currently import from the Middle East and Venezuela combined.
  • Put 1 million Plug-In Hybrid cars — cars that can get up to 150 miles per gallon — on the road by 2015, cars that we will work to make sure are built here in America.
  • Ensure 10 percent of our electricity comes from renewable sources by 2012, and 25 percent by 2025.
  • Implement an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent by 2050.

November 3, 2008

Whatever you do tomorrow, vote Democratic

Here in Kentucky, you’ll know that we’re often stuck in an electoral conundrum at this time of the year - vote for a Republican who has done no good whatsoever in their lifetime, or vote for a Democrat that is, more often than not, just about as promising as their opponent. We walk a very fine line in the Commonwealth. This year, perhaps even more than in 2004, it is important that, regardless of the nuances, we do the right thing. And yes, by do the right thing, I mean vote Democratic.

While it would be incredibly easy for one to see my qualms with Senator Obama on energy and environmental issues, he has, in reality, proposed the most sweeping reforms to our energy and environmental policy in American history - and, sadly, John McCain has done nothing but pay lip service to his supposed ‘mavericky’ persona on energy policy. Instead, he has simply sounded the “drill, baby, drill” refrain a few too many times for my liking. Likewise, it’s hard to take a candidate’s environmental policy seriously when their half-brained running mate disputes the scientific consensus of anthropogenic global warming, while simultaneously suggesting that one can solve a problem without knowing its causes. Such is the thinking behind the whole GOP ticket.

So we’re stuck in the conundrum, but there is only one way out - vote for the candidate who will help put you where you want to be. Barack Obama isn’t going to be the end of history (since when did Marxism become really important to 21st century Americans?) - but he’ll get us at least one step closer to the place that we should all want to be: a prosperous, equal, inclusive and carbon neutral country.

In Kentucky, we are cursed with many god-awful politicians - but we’ve also been blessed with a few of the best. If you live in Louisville or central Kentucky, be proud to go to the polls tomorrow and cast your vote for either Rep. John Yarmuth (KY-03) or Rep. Ben Chandler (KY-06), who have performed honorably in their short years representing our Commonwealth, each earning 100% scores from the League of Conservation Voters. Unfortunately, the same can’t be said about their Republican counterparts in the Kentucky congressional delegation. Senators Mitch McConnell and Jim Bunning, along with Rep. Ed Whitfield (KY-01), Rep. Geoff Davis (KY-04) and Rep. Hal Rogers (KY-05) are five of the worst congressmen, ponying up for big coal time after time. Even if progressive candidates like Heather Ryan (D-01) and Michael Kelley (D-04) face an uphill battle tomorrow, it is important that whatever you do, you don’t vote Republican. Even if you’re still bitter over Bruce Lunsford endorsing Ernie Fletcher in the 2003 gubernatorial race, defeating Mitch McConnell should be the 2nd most important priority for progressive Democrats across the country. McConnell has, as Senate Minority Leader, engineered obstruction time and time again, especially on global warming and renewable energy legislation - as much as Lunsford falls short of the goal, there is nobody who could possibly perform worse than McConnell.

Even when you get down to our state legislative races, we’re presented with any number of miserable DINOs like Jim Gooch in eastern Kentucky, as well as the mini-obstructionist in GOP State Senate President David Williams. By electing progressive Democrats to the state legislature, like Lexington’s own Kathy Stein and Kelly Flood, we can look forward to taking back the state legislature, as well as creating a cleaner and healthier environment here in the Bluegrass state, along with more prosperous communities that value all citizens - not just the executives of big coal. Even if you want to throw environmental policy aside (but why would we do that?), the Democratic party represents the future of our state and our nation, and the only realistic way to move towards a more just and more positive future - just look at the past eight years to know what the next four would look like under John McCain and the Republican party.

Whatever you do tomorrow, vote Democratic.

October 17, 2008

Who’s that in the magazines?

Oh, that’s me! Check out the feature they did about me and UK Greenthumb. if you can get ahold of the whole thing, you can see all of the sustainability-related research and teaching that people in the UK College of Arts and Sciences are doing. again, very cool that UK is finally pushing sustainability, even in small ways…

October 16, 2008

Event: Michael Oppenheimer @ UK Tonight!

WHAT: Michael Oppenheimer delivers the annual UK Arts & Sciences Blazer Lecture
WHEN: Thursday, October 16th at 7:30pm
WHERE: The Singletary Center Concert Hall on the University of Kentucky campus
HOW MUCH: FREE and open to the public

Just in case you’ve been living under a rock, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change scientist Dr. Michael Oppenheimer will be lecturing at UK this evening. Oppenheimer is an expert in both earth science and environmental policy, and follows in the slew of sustainability-related lectures and events on campus in the last month or two. To be frank, I can’t believe it’s been happening, but I won’t complain about it.

I didn’t have the chance to interview Dr. Oppenheimer yesterday, but Greenthumb co-coordinator Tate White did. check out her interview with Dr. Oppenheimer, courtesy of former Greenthumb co-coordinator and AASHE staff member Niles Barnes.